Cargando
Preparando la información solicitada…
Cargando
Preparando la información solicitada…
AI is only as good as the data that feeds it. Data quality audit with verifiable criteria: lineage, versioning, ownership, and objective metrics. Data without traceability is risk, not an asset.

"AI is only as good as the data that feeds it. Without verifiable lineage, there is no possible audit."Fernando Arrieta — Data Governance Auditor
Organizations invest in models, infrastructure, and talent — but not in the quality of the data that feeds everything above. The result: AI with the appearance of precision built on data no one verified.
Undetected bias. Training data that does not represent the populations where the model operates. The result looks objective but is biased from the source.
Non-existent lineage. No one knows where the data comes from, how it was transformed, or who validated its quality. Without lineage, there is no possible audit or reproducibility.
Diffuse ownership. No one is responsible for data quality. There are no data stewards, no service level agreements, no coverage or freshness metrics.
Six dimensions that every data quality program must measure with evidence.
Data correctly reflects the reality it represents. Verified against sources of truth with measured error rates.
All necessary fields are present. Null percentage, category coverage, and temporal representativeness are assessed.
The same data produces the same results across different sources and systems. Reconciliation between databases and transformation processes is verified.
Each data point can be traced from its origin to its use in the model: source, transformations, validations, and version.
Data reflects the current state of the world. Freshness, update frequency, and temporal lag are assessed.
Data adequately represents the populations and contexts where the model will operate. Selection bias and under-representation detection.
Dataset inventory. Catalog of all datasets involved in AI systems: source, format, frequency, volume, owner.
Lineage map. Visual traceability of each dataset: origin → transformations → destination (model). Includes validation points and versions.
Quality dashboard. Objective measurement of each quality dimension per dataset: accuracy, completeness, consistency, freshness, representativeness.
Bias analysis. Representativeness assessment and bias detection in training data, with documented impact on model results.
Improvement roadmap. Prioritized corrective action plan, ownership assignment, and definition of service level agreements for data quality.
It is the ability to demonstrate that data used to train, validate, and operate AI systems meets verifiable criteria of accuracy, completeness, timeliness, consistency, and representativeness. Without auditable data quality, AI results are not trustworthy.
ISO/IEC 42001 requires organizations to manage data as an AI system resource. This includes collection, preparation, labeling, storage, and lifecycle. Data quality is an implicit requirement throughout the standard.
It is the complete traceability of data from its origin to its use in an AI model: where it comes from, how it was transformed, who validated it, what version was used, and when. Without lineage, there is no reproducibility or possible audit.
With objective metrics: null field percentage, cross-source consistency, data freshness, population representativeness, presence of bias, and temporal coverage. Not with subjective opinions.
An AI model trained with biased data produces biased results — with the appearance of algorithmic objectivity. The data quality audit includes bias and representativeness analysis as mandatory controls.
If your organization needs to assess data quality for AI or regulatory compliance, this is the channel to discuss scope and methodology. All inquiries are handled under confidentiality.
The consulting and implementation services described on this site are provided independently. Certification audits and decisions are the exclusive responsibility of accredited certification bodies. In accordance with ISO/IEC 17021-1 §5.2, impartiality restrictions and cooling-off periods apply.