Cargando
Preparando la información solicitada…
Cargando
Preparando la información solicitada…
Anti-corruption systems, enterprise risk management, and board-level accountability frameworks with auditable records. From diagnosis to certification readiness under ISO 37001.

"Corruption is not an accident — it is a systemic failure. Governance with evidence is the antidote."Fernando Arrieta — Lead Auditor ISO 37001 · Infobae Columnist
Organizations that rely on codes of conduct without auditable controls face regulatory sanctions, reputational damage, and loss of institutional trust. Corporate governance requires evidence, not intentions.
Corruption cost. Corruption costs LATAM 5% of GDP annually. Organizations without anti-bribery controls face regulatory penalties, contract disqualification, and criminal liability.
Compliance fatigue. Regulatory requirements multiply across jurisdictions. Without an integrated governance framework, organizations spend 3× more on compliance with diminishing returns.
Board-level liability. Directors face personal liability for governance failures. ISO 37001 provides a due diligence defense — documented evidence that anti-corruption controls were in place.
Five pillars of auditable corporate governance. Each pillar produces verifiable evidence.
ISO 37001 implementation: risk assessment, due diligence, financial controls, reporting channels, and investigation procedures.
COSO ERM framework integration: risk appetite, risk assessment, control activities, monitoring, and board-level oversight.
Multi-jurisdictional compliance framework: regulatory mapping, obligations register, control matrix, and audit trail.
Whistleblower channels, investigation protocols, disciplinary procedures, and documented escalation paths.
Transparency reporting, stakeholder communication, public accountability, and verifiable disclosure practices.
Management review, corrective actions, internal audit program, and metrics dashboard for governance effectiveness.
Assessment of anti-corruption controls, compliance maturity, and governance gaps in 72 hours.
Corruption risk assessment by business unit, geography, and transaction type. Prioritized by impact.
Anti-corruption policy, roles, controls, reporting channels, and investigation procedures.
Field-verified controls with auditable records. Training program for all organizational levels.
Mock audit under ISO 37001, finding closure, and PDCA cycle. The certification body decides.
ISO 37001 is the international standard for anti-bribery management systems. It provides requirements for establishing, implementing, and improving an anti-bribery program. Organizations facing corruption risks, public procurement, or international operations benefit from documented due diligence.
ISO 37001 focuses specifically on anti-bribery controls, while COSO ERM provides the broader enterprise risk management framework. They are complementary: ISO 37001 addresses corruption risk within the COSO ERM architecture.
Yes. The Annex SL high-level structure is shared across ISO management system standards. Integration reduces duplication, creates a single PDCA cycle, and provides a unified audit framework.
The initial integrity diagnosis takes 72 hours. Full implementation typically takes 4-8 months depending on organizational complexity, geographic scope, and existing compliance maturity.
Documented risk assessments, due diligence records, training logs, investigation reports, corrective action registers, management reviews, and internal audit findings. Every control produces an auditable record.
Open channel for organizations seeking to build integrity systems with criteria and evidence.
Certification is issued exclusively by accredited independent bodies. Fernando Arrieta provides preparation, diagnosis, and training — never certification itself. This separation is required by ISO/IEC 17021-1.