Cargando
Preparando la información solicitada…
Cargando
Preparando la información solicitada…
The complete cross-mapping between the 93 Annex A controls of ISO 27001:2022 and the Annex A controls of ISO 42001:2023 identified 37 controls with direct or functional overlap, 18 ISO 42001 controls exclusive to AI management (with no ISO 27001 equivalent), and 56 ISO 27001 controls requiring no extension to cover AI risks. Organizations already operating a mature ISMS under ISO 27001 can implement ISO 42001 with estimated savings of 40% in documentation hours, 35% in internal audit hours, and 28% in external certification costs, versus implementing both systems independently. The 18 AI-exclusive controls not covered by the ISMS include: AI system inventory (A.6.2.2), AI impact assessment (full Annex B), human oversight of automated decisions (A.10.3), and model lifecycle management (A.6.2.5). The proposed incremental roadmap divides integration into 4 phases of 3 months each, with verifiable milestones and minimum evidence required per phase.
Central questions answered with verifiable data from the study.
37 controls have direct or functional overlap. 18 ISO 42001 controls are AI-exclusive. 56 ISO 27001 controls require no extension.
40% in documentation, 35% in internal audit, 28% in external certification costs versus implementing both systems separately.
18 exclusive controls, including AI inventory (A.6.2.2), impact assessment (Annex B), human oversight (A.10.3), and model lifecycle (A.6.2.5).
Steps completed, sources consulted, and evidence collected during the study.
Normative and theoretical framework: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 (93 controls, Annex A); ISO/IEC 42001:2023 (AIMS controls, Annexes A–D); ISO 27005:2022 (IS risk management); NIST AI RMF 1.0; ISO high-level harmonized structure (HLS, Annex SL).
Documents with the full results of this research, adaptable to each organization’s context.
Request the complete methodological package for research [INV-03]. Institutional use only.
Research that extends or contrasts the findings of this study.
Help circulate evidence-based governance.
If the question is institutional and has context, we can guide you on the next steps.