Cargando
Preparando la información solicitada…
Cargando
Preparando la información solicitada…
Analysis of 80 transition projects from the 2013 to the 2022 version of ISO/IEC 27001 in Argentina, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru showed that 55% of organizations faced schedule deviations exceeding 30% due to underestimating the complexity of the 11 new controls. The controls generating the most implementation difficulties were: Threat Intelligence (A.5.7) — 62% lacked formal sources and analysis processes; Cloud Security (A.5.23) — 48% had no defined security criteria for cloud service selection and management; and Configuration Management (A.8.9) — 53% lacked documented configuration baselines or change monitoring tools. The study identified that organizations approaching the transition as a mere 'documentary mapping' (updating the Statement of Applicability without operational changes) had an external audit finding rate 3 times higher than those conducting an operational gap analysis. A step-by-step compliance guide for the 11 new controls was developed, reducing implementation time by an average of 25%.
Central questions answered with verifiable data from the study.
55% have schedule deviations exceeding 30% due to underestimating new controls.
Threat Intelligence (62% no process), Cloud Security (48% no criteria), Configuration Management (53% no baselines).
An external audit finding rate 3 times higher than those doing operational analysis.
Steps completed, sources consulted, and evidence collected during the study.
Normative and theoretical framework: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 (changes in clauses 4-10 and Annex A); IAF MD 26 Transition Guide; ISO/IEC 27002:2022 (control implementation guidance); NIST CSF 2.0 (alignment with new controls).
Documents with the full results of this research, adaptable to each organization’s context.
Request the complete methodological package for research [INV-14]. Institutional use only.
Research that extends or contrasts the findings of this study.
Help circulate evidence-based governance.
If the question is institutional and has context, we can guide you on the next steps.