Analysis

Analysis.

Evidence before deciding.

Information security, artificial intelligence and quality. Each report starts with a specific question and develops an interpretation with sources, context and limitations.

Read the latest analysis

Auditing · evidence · responsibility

Fernando Arrieta during a conversation outside an industrial facility
Visit to industrial facilities.
Latest
Report No. 27 Criteria analysis

Before delegating a critical decision to AI: what evidence an organisation should examine

  • The subject of examination is the decision within an operation: what AI can do, with what information and under whose responsibility.
  • The evidence must make it possible to reconstruct what happened and verify that human intervention and operational continuity work.
  • An efficiency improvement requires measuring its effects and life cycle. Adopting AI does not in itself demonstrate a circular outcome.
Read the full report →
Full archive

Analysis by topic.

Choose a field to explore its questions and documents.

11 Jun 2026 — 13 Jul 2026

Information security

Digital risk, operational continuity and responsibility for information.

  1. No. 16 NIS2 and DORA · how requirements reach Latin American suppliers through contracts Technical observation
  2. No. 06 Cybersecurity as demonstrable trust · from technical defence to evidence Context report
23 May 2026 — 19 Sep 2026

AI and algorithmic governance

How to review models, data, responsible parties and controls before trusting an automated decision.

  1. No. 27 Before delegating a critical decision to AI: what evidence an organisation should examine Criteria analysis
  2. No. 21 AI auditing and governance in Argentina and Latin America Context report
  3. No. 18 OpenAI under the microscope · ISO 42001, 27001 and 9001 document audit Review of public evidence
  4. No. 17 The Latin American AI paradox · adoption without critical mass Context report
  5. No. 13 AI and credit scoring · when the algorithm decides who gets access to credit Criteria-based interpretation
  6. No. 04 Annual audit of AI operations · model obsolescence alert Institutional alert
  7. No. 01 The state of algorithmic governance in Latin America Context report
23 May 2026 — 30 Sep 2026

Quality and management systems

Processes, operational evidence and the ability to sustain results.

  1. Note Quality Kit: funding a system that works Editorial note
  2. No. 15 ISO 37001:2025 · changes, transition and relationship with Law 27.401 Institutional alert
  3. No. 14 ISO 14001:2026 · what changed and how to interpret the transition Context report
  4. No. 26 Verifiable sustainability · when the environmental narrative needs evidence Context report
  5. No. 24 The fake paperwork market · fraudulent certificates and the public registry's response Review of public evidence
  6. No. 12 Tailor-made vs off-the-shelf systems · on the honest implementation of management systems Technical observation
  7. No. 09 Certification theatre · a warning about decorative systems Institutional alert
  8. No. 02 The certification gap · why Latin America certifies less Technical observation
23 May 2026 — 30 May 2026

The state and public integrity

Transparency, procurement, implementation and public accountability examined through evidence.

  1. No. 23 A verifiable state and public integrity · cases that already exist Context report
  2. No. 20 Province of Buenos Aires · structural audit of government management 2018-2026 Technical observation
  3. No. 10 Corruption and economic cost in Latin America · a review of public evidence Review of public evidence
  4. No. 07 Municipal integrity · digital protection for local governments Technical observation
  5. No. 05 The Argentine state viewed as a system · a review of public evidence Review of public evidence
23 May 2026 — 11 Jun 2026

The auditing profession

Independence, leadership, evidence and professional responsibility.

  1. No. 25 Fabricated evidence · deepfakes, synthetic records and the provenance premium Institutional alert
  2. No. 22 Technical trust · evidence, scope and responsibility Criteria-based interpretation
  3. No. 11 System leadership · ISO clause 5 read with operational honesty Criteria-based interpretation
  4. No. 08 Technical Trust · genealogy of an operational category Criteria-based interpretation
  5. No. 03 Clause 5.2 · auditor / implementer separation Criteria-based interpretation
Correct use

Citing a report requires a date and a clear boundary.

Cite the canonical page, not a standalone PDF: the page includes a date and canonical URL.

WhatsApp G-CERTI